Automated audit

Find your accessibility problems before someone else does.

This is the output of our testing pipeline, delivered exactly as it comes out: per-page findings mapped to WCAG 2.1 AA, with evidence, severity and remediation steps for your developer. $149 for 10 pages, back within 24 hours. No specialist reviews it and nobody signs it, and the report says so on its first page.

If you have received a demand letter or been served, this is not the product you want. Your attorney will ask who validated the findings, and the honest answer here is nobody. Order the signed audit instead: same pipeline, plus an IAAP-certified specialist who reviews every finding and signs the report by name.

What you get

What you do not get, stated plainly

Nobody can sell you immunity from an accessibility claim, and anyone who says otherwise is selling something else. What this buys you is an accurate list of what is broken, early enough to fix it on your own schedule.

Which one you actually need

Automated audit

$149 10 pages

  • You want to know where you stand and fix things
  • Pipeline output, no review, no signature
  • Back within 24 hours
Pay $149 and order
Started with the automated audit and now need the signed version? We credit what you paid against it in full for 30 days, so choosing the cheaper one first costs you nothing. Just reply to your delivery email.

Selling into the EU

The European Accessibility Act has applied since 28 June 2025 and enforcement is live across member states, with WCAG 2.1 AA as the technical standard behind it. If you sell to EU consumers, the first useful step is knowing what your site actually fails, and this audit gives you that. Whether the Act covers you, and how far, depends on your size, sector and member state, so treat this as the factual starting point for that conversation rather than the answer to it. For the formal accessibility statement most obligations end in, the signed audit is the version worth having, because it carries an independent reviewer's name.

Common questions

Is this the same as a free accessibility checker?

No. A free checker runs deterministic rules and stops, which reaches roughly a third of WCAG. Our pipeline adds evaluation of the criteria that need judgment: whether alt text actually describes the image, whether a link's purpose is clear from its own text, whether headings match the visual structure, whether the keyboard path works, and contrast measured against what the page really renders. You also get remediation steps per finding rather than a rule name and an error count.

Why is it so much cheaper than the signed audit?

Because the expensive part of an audit is a certified specialist's time, and this tier does not include it. That is the whole difference: same pipeline, same evidence, no human pass and no signature.

Can I show this report to a client or an auditor?

You can send it to anyone, and the report is honest about what produced it. But if the reader needs an independent opinion they can rely on, they will want a named reviewer, and that is the signed audit. Buying this one first costs you nothing towards it for 30 days.

How is the report produced?

Our methodology page describes every layer, including which findings come from deterministic checks and which from automated judgment, and the report labels each finding with its source. Captured evidence is analysed by large language models; we say that in the report, the methodology and the terms, because a reader deciding what to trust needs to know it.